Family Law

• Divorce

Criminal Law

• Criminal Defense
  Mr. Jayaraman has approximately 30 years of experience in criminal litigation. He has won several jury trials in federal District Courts
• Sex Crimes
  The seminal cases he litigated including jury trials involve inter alia Three Strikes statute, sex offenses, Federal and State rape cases, first degree murder, telemarketing fraud, wire fraud, mail fraud, all types of drug cases, and practically most areas of statutory violations enshrined in Titles 18 and 21 of the United States Code (Titles 18 & 21 U.S.C.).
• Fraud
• Drug Crimes
• Murder
• Arson
  In a leading case in this area which he won before the U.S. District Court in the Western District of Tennessee and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Court, the Court of Appeals upheld Mr. Jayaraman's argument alleging ineffective assistance by prior trial counsel in an arson conviction case and the Court of Appeals vacated the conviction and sentence.

Immigration Law

• Citizenship and Naturalization
• Family Immigration
  He has represented innumerable clients in family based immigration in all categories of citizens and permanent residents sponsoring their relatives and in waiver applications involving criminal grounds of inadmission and dealing with grounds of inadmissibility due to 3 year 10 year bar.
• Work Visas
  Mr. Jayaraman's law firm handles all matters relating to immigration. He has proven expertise in the areas of all family & employment based visas, National Interest Waiver EB 1 and EB 2, Permanent Labor Certification, EB 5 investment visa, H 1, L 1, F 1, E, R, TN and other work visas both temporary and permanent and N 400 citizenship applications and their denial related litigation in Federal Courts.

Health Law

• Medical Malpractice
  Mr. Jayaraman has proven expertise in handling civil matters involving divorce, breach of contract, forfeiture, writs of habeas corpus and legal and medical malpractice. He has also represented clients in international divorce and custody matters and successfully represented clients in international extradition matters.

Trusts and Estates

• Power of Attorney
  "Owing to the defense team's incompetent trial strategy, Defendant was forced to admit incriminating facts in a vacuum, including that he had sole access to the church, that he was alone for stretches of time on the day of the fire, that he had unfettered control of church finances, that he wielded his financial authority in a questionable manner, and that he personally signed the insurance forms. What counsel failed to elicit after these admissions, however, were all the facts that Defendant could have provided to explain his behavior or to cast his incriminating responses into doubt. The jury did not hear from Defendant that he could precisely describe his whereabouts for most of the day, that he was asleep on his couch when the fire was discovered, that he immediately rushed to the church to try and save some of its valuable assets, that the church board knew of his prior expenditures and never accused him of misusing church funds, and that he signed the insurance forms only at the advice of attorneys, with the approval of the church board, and pursuant to a valid and legal power of attorney. This informational imbalance was the direct product of deficient advice, inadequate preparation, and indefensible choices of Defendant's own defense counsel."