Employment Law

• Employment Contract
  In the appellate briefings, FSB argued that the District Court  correctly determined that the plaintiff failed to plead sufficient facts to support that the casino’s general manager intentionally interfered with her employment contract, that the District Court correctly determined the plaintiff failed to plead sufficient facts to identify an independent wrongful act by the casino apart from the alleged interference with business relations, and the District Court correctly determined that the casino’s general manager was furthering a legitimate business interest in sending the letter.